On 17/Apr/16 18:09, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Nope. But you need Internet in VRF, if you can't put sufficient filter on lo0. I just wouldn't buy the platform in the first place, but that's just me. > Why? I imagine the cost is same. I don't imagine individual route > entries in RIB or in FIB have table index and even if they do have, I > do not expect that there is special INET version of that structure in > hardware, where this index does not exist. The last time I considered the Internet in a VRF (late 2000's), the platforms then had different scaling properties with routes in a VRF. IIRC, the more VRF's the fewer routes per VRF, and vice versa. Of course, things have come a long way since then, I'm sure, but I don't run the Internet in a VRF, so don't have hands-on experience with such a topology (even though it still concerns me). Is it possible to have as many full BGP sessions on a 16GB RAM control plane in inet.0/inet6.0 as you would the same in a VRF? Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
