Jason,

I could be wrong, but I believe MX5 do B-RAS, using subscriber management.

my-user@my-router> show system license
License usage:
                                 Licenses     Licenses    Licenses    Expiry
  Feature name                       used    installed      needed
  scale-subscriber                      0         1000           0    permanent
  scale-l2tp                            0         1000           0    permanent
  scale-mobile-ip                       0         1000           0    permanent

Licenses installed: none

my-user@my-router> show chassis routing-engine | match Model
    Model                          RE-MX5-T

http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/concept/subscriber-management-pppoe.html

Regards,


2016-05-09 15:45 GMT-03:00 Jason Warren via juniper-nsp
<juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>:
> I have a Cisco 7206VXR that I am wanting to replace with a Juniper MX80 
> (purchased as an MX5) or similar. The main core function is just Ethernet 
> routing... but it also is acting as a B-RAS router for about 400 PPPoE 
> sessions. I know the license cost on the MX80 for subscriber services is 
> close to $15k.. which honestly puts it out of budget and pushes me back to a 
> re-manufactured Cisco ASR.. Does anyone have some recommendations as to how 
> to pull this off in a Juniper world? I was told by a VAR that on some of the 
> larger Juniper chassis, this is not an issue as it is commonly included but 
> unfortunately he was not positive which chassis this would be.
> My current thought is to maybe put a Cisco 7301 to service this function if 
> nothing else...
> Thank you in advance for any experience and advice anyone can offer!
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



-- 
Eduardo Schoedler
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to