Hello,

        I am facing similar problem with EVPN over MPLS. I am using  17.1R1.8 
Junos build. The control plane, mac table looks fine. I see ARP resolved on 
one-end but other is not happening....

        Issues with both instance-type as EVPN or Virtual-switch with EVPN.  No 
IRB configured.

        Any help???? 

        Output of Ping and tcpdump on both sides

******************************************************************************
  Ping f=>  21.1.1.1 
******************************************************************************

root@cuttack> ping 21.1.1.1 interface ge-2/0/4.2345    
PING 21.1.1.1 (21.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
root@cuttack:~ # tcpdump -i ge-2/0/4.2345 -s 1500
Listening on ge-2/0/4.2345, capture size 1500 bytes

09:58:38.787719 Out arp who-has 21.1.1.1 tell 21.1.1.2
09:58:39.588860 Out arp who-has 21.1.1.1 tell 21.1.1.2
09:58:40.388273 Out arp who-has 21.1.1.1 tell 21.1.1.2
09:58:41.188860 Out arp who-has 21.1.1.1 tell 21.1.1.2
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
root@kochin% tcpdump -i ge-0/0/6.2345 -s 1500
Listening on ge-0/0/6.2345, capture size 1500 bytes

arp who-has 21.1.1.1 tell 21.1.1.2
arp reply 21.1.1.1 is-at 80:71:1f:16:38:06
arp who-has 21.1.1.1 tell 21.1.1.2
arp reply 21.1.1.1 is-at 80:71:1f:16:38:06
arp who-has 21.1.1.1 tell 21.1.1.2
arp reply 21.1.1.1 is-at 80:71:1f:16:38:06
arp who-has 21.1.1.1 tell 21.1.1.2

******************************************************************************
 Ping => 21.1.1.2
******************************************************************************
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
root@kochin> ping 21.1.1.2               
PING 21.1.1.2 (21.1.1.2): 56 data bytes
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++        
root@kochin% tcpdump -i ge-0/0/6.2345 -s 1500

IP 21.1.1.1 > 21.1.1.2: ICMP echo request, id 26512, seq 4, length 64
IP 21.1.1.1 > 21.1.1.2: ICMP echo request, id 26512, seq 5, length 64
IP 21.1.1.1 > 21.1.1.2: ICMP echo request, id 26512, seq 6, length 64
IP 21.1.1.1 > 21.1.1.2: ICMP echo request, id 26512, seq 7, length 64
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
root@cuttack:~ # tcpdump -i ge-2/0/4.2345 -s 1500

Listening on ge-2/0/4.2345, capture size 1500 bytes

^C
0 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Cheers,
Anand

________________________________
Anand Beedi
o   +91 80 612 10427
m  +91 97396 77746
abe...@juniper.net
www.juniper.net


-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Alexander Marhold
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 20:46
To: aheb...@pubnix.net; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Any sort of EVPN Success with: vMX 16.x and QFX5100

Hi
As far as I know the paper deals with EVPN over VXLAN And As far as I know the 
vMX 16.1 does NOT support EVPN over VXLAN ( at least that I was told by some 
Juniper SEs and by the PLM manager for EVPN)

Regards

Alexander
INDC

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Im Auftrag von 
Alain Hebert
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Oktober 2016 16:24
An: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Betreff: [j-nsp] Any sort of EVPN Success with: vMX 16.x and QFX5100

    Hi,

    We've been working on a lab re-creating a Juniper whitepaper on the subject 
of EVPN, but we cannot figure out where we messed up =D

    Everything show up correctly in the core, spines/leafs, but L2 broadcast's 
are not propagated/managed as expected by the Core.

        aka: cannot ping between test devices on access ports for the Tenant 
since ARP broadcast are not answered.

    Anyone got any success?  Or do we have the wrong white paper?

    Thank for your time.

------

    PS: I wish Juniper would adopt the standard to list the devices and their 
firmware to those whitepapers.  Took 1/2 a day to figure out we needed 16.x for 
the vMX part of the equation. Oh and some peer review =D

    White paper in question:

       
https://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/whitepapers/2000606-en.pdf

-----
Alain Hebert                                aheb...@pubnix.net   
PubNIX Inc.        
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to