Christopher E. Brown wrote: > > Using different cluster-ids you end up with multiple copies of all the > prefixes but done correctly it works just fine and provides better > redundancy at the cost of higher "path" count. > > If you are running single cluster-id and pushing router memory limits it > would be a bad idea. > > If you have the memory, dual RRs with different cluster-ids and > multipath are not a bad thing. > > Not like I have a fairly large network doing exactly that since 2011 > without issue.
Dear Christopher, What do you mean by "done correctly" in this case? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN AS43859 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp