On 25/Jun/18 17:50, Chris Boyd wrote:
> Other than the administrative controls of mature route filtering tools in > BGP, I’m curious why people choose BGP over OSPF for route injection. For our Anycast DNS, we actually use OSPF (Quagga) on FreeBSD, upstream those to a router, and then redistribute them into IS-IS (since that's what we run for our core). Personally, I find the use of an IGP for this kind of thing easier than BGP, as those IGP routes are all internal, and are covered by the BGP aggregate we send out to the world. Of course, unlike Joel and the rest, I don't run a large farm of servers, so I may not be immediately seeing the value of going with BGP. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
