> From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi] > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2018 11:44 AM > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 16:40, <adamv0...@netconsultings.com> wrote: > > > Another alternative would be to spin up a separate BGP process, which I > think is supported only in XR, but once again that somewhat places one on > the outskirts of the common deployment graph. > > But I know Mark is using csr1k -so depending on the available NFVI > resources (I guess dedicated servers in this case), I think it's not that > onerous > to spin up yet another VM right? > > I think many vendors support this. JunOS supports multiple RPD instances in > single FreeBSD instance and multiple FreeBSD instances in single Linux > instance. > Really? Interesting, didn't know that, are these features documented anywhere? I could not find anything looking for multi instance RPD. Are the RPD instances as ships in night, each maintaining its own set of tables and protocols?
> Personally I'd run the RRs for different AFIs in separate hardware, because > RR hardware is not really where the costs are. > Yeah all the costs are in edge devices, even core routers HW is order of magnitude more expensive than that of RRs adam netconsultings.com ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp