Hello,

Finally, these QFX went in production... with a L2 circuit configured to
bypass this VXLAN issue.
I'm totally giving up VXLAN for a while.
Thank you all for your replies.
Olivier

Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 à 15:03, Alexandre Guimaraes <
alexandre.guimar...@ascenty.com> a écrit :

> Well...
>
>         From my experience with QFX5100, Q-inQ, does not work at all, only
> one(in one) vlan have the right to pass(VXLAN), L2TP Protocols don't have
> the rights to pass, funny thing....
>
>         For years I discuss with local Juniper representative or Juniper
> team itself... but... no one cent about a solution.... once again, when I
> need a QinQ(full services), I use Cisco Catalysts
>
>         Don't expend time and energy trying to find a solution for this
> neglect....
>
>         I heard the same thing about the version 18.x, but honestly...
> leave it there... I still prefer keep my environment work and running with
> 14.1X53 with Mpls stuffs and an EX facing the customer.....   flow like
> water....
>
>
> Att.,
> Alexandre Guimarães
> +55.19. 3517-7724
> +55.19. 99822.4866
>
> alexandre.guimar...@ascenty.com
> www.ascenty.com <http://www.ascenty.com/>
>
>
>
> Em 11/09/2018 09:46, "juniper-nsp em nome de Alain Hebert" <
> juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net em nome de aheb...@pubnix.net>
> escreveu:
>
>          Hi,
>
>          On QFX5100 the L2TP/Q-in-Q services has limitations.  I have to
> dig
>     through my pile of tickets for details...  but I remember something
>     about PVST+ packets not being forwarded at all.
>
>          So we just switched everything to MPLS/l2circuits/VLAN CCC (for
>     now) instead of battling with the QFX5100 platforms.  We'll deploy
>     EVPN/VXLAN to our customers once we find a solution but we're not in a
> rush.
>
>          PS: I heard a rumor that there is a fix in 18.x for the QFX5100...
>
>          To note that the QFX5110 platform do not seem to be suffering
> from
>     the same issues...  I suggest to get a demo to confirm the
> functionality.
>
>     -----
>     Alain Hebert                                aheb...@pubnix.net
>     PubNIX Inc.
>     50 boul. St-Charles
>     P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
>     Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443
>
>     On 09/10/18 17:20, Pavel Lunin wrote:
>     > Hey,
>     >
>     > The Q-in-Q encapsulation comes from the EX2300 switches to the QFX
> switches
>     >> (the S-VLAN Q-in-Q tag is also 1001), but on the other end of the
> tunnel we
>     >> don't have the Q-in-Q frames coming.
>     >>
>     > I am curious if the packets don't leave the ingress VTEP at all or
> the
>     > tail-end VTEP can't treat them.
>     >
>     > "ping -f -s 1000" and "monitor interface traffic" can help to figure
> out
>     > where the packets are dropped. And if the VXLAN packets leave the
>     > core-facing interface of the ingress VTEP, I'd suggest to put a
> sniffer in
>     > the middle and take a look at the packets closely.
>     >
>     > Not that I am sure that it will work but... Juniper explicitly says
> that
>     > it's supported on all Trident2/2+/3-based switches in the very very
> fresh
>     > JUNOS (make sure that you don't miss this point).
>     >
>     > I suspect that it's not a honest Q-in-Q-in-VXLAN but some cheating,
> e. g.
>     > pop the VLAN tags and push them back on the other side, while VXLAN
> tunnel
>     > carries untagged / single-tagged frames. (Yes this requires per-vlan
>     > tunnels and might not work for your need).
>     >
>     > This is how VLAN-based Martini pseudowires work on those switches
> (even on
>     > EX4550, if memory serves). It's officially supported in
> EX-to-EX/QFX-to-QFX
>     > mode, where it works out-of-the-box, while in case where you have an
>     > MX-like router on the other end, you need to manually push/pop VLAN
> tags
>     > and disable control-word on the MX side (discussed many times in
> this list).
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > Pavel
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>     > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to