AFAIK from LNS (but probably the same issue ) in Tomcat you can not use static route to subscriber Only via radius I suspect it is because there is no IFL for the subscriber only flow
but take a look on https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/configuration-statement/routing-services-edit-dynamic-profiles-interfaces.html It might help Nitzan On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:52 PM Alex D. <listensamm...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hello, > > does anyone know, if it is possible to manually configure a static route > (or access route) with a next-hop assigned to a demux logical interface > in a DHCP dynamic subscriber management setup ? > I know, that the common way to route a subnet to a subscriber is by > assigning the specific route by RADIUS using the Framed-Route attribute. > In my lab setup, this works fine, but currently we don't use RADIUS > authentication in production yet. This will be implemented soon, but > unfortunately i need to route a subnet to a subscriber now. > Today i just tried to manually configure a route, but it didn't work. > Output of "show route" looks strange (no next-hop specified) > > detzen@vs-mx5-testlab.6898# run show route 192.1.2.0/29 > inet.0: 1977 destinations, 3901 routes (1977 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > 192.1.2.0/29 *[Static/5] 00:11:17, metric2 0 > > > > In contrast, the output when assigning the route by RADIUS with the > Framed-Route attribute: > > detzen@vs-mx5-testlab.6898> show route 192.1.2.0/29 > inet.0: 1980 destinations, 3907 routes (1980 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > 192.1.2.0/29 *[Access/13] 00:00:35 > Private unicast > > > Regards, > Alex > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp