Thanks guys,
I got the solution from "MPLS In The SDN Era". On older software versions you 
need this:
"set routing-options forwarding-table chained-composite-next-hop ingress evpn"
The EVPN route uses "chained-composite-next-hop" and it is on by default in 
newer versions.



Best regards
Enoch Nyatoti

 

    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019, 4:59:15 PM GMT+2, Roger Wiklund 
<roger.wikl...@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Forget 14.1R1. Go with 18.1R3-S6 and try again.
/Roger
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:52 PM Enoch Nyatoti via juniper-nsp 
<juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:

Hi guys,
I have a lab set up on EVE-NG to test EVPN. I am running version 14.1R1.10. 

When my local PE router learns a new MAC/IP binding it installs a host route in 
the IP VPN VRF with protocol type EVPN and a next hop of the VLAN’s IRB 
interface. This triggers the PE to transmit this host route to remote PEs that 
are members of the IP VPN via a VPN route advertisement. The remote PEs add 
this route to their VRF with protocol type BGP.
The PE also advertises the MAC/IP binding via a MAC/IP Advertisement
route to remote PEs. I see this type 2 route on the remote PEs. So far so good. 

From hereon things start to divert from expectation. I expected the remote PE  
to install a corresponding host route in its IP VPN VRF with protocol type 
EVPN. I only see the BGP route via IP VPN VRF in the VRF.inet.0 table. The 
MAC/IP route is supposed to be the preferred on but I don't even have it.
Where could things be going wrong.
RegardsEnoch





_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

  
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to