On 20/Jul/19 19:10, Olivier Benghozi wrote: > We usually prefer LAGs here (with microBFD on backbone links) ; but, any > horror stories to share? BFD on LAG's is broken. Hashing on LACP is less predictable than hashing on IP. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and Juniper MX204 Eric Van Tol
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and Junip... Gert Doering
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and J... Eric Van Tol
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X a... Gert Doering
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002... Olivier Benghozi
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between... Per Westerlund
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG bet... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG bet... Nathan Ward
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between... Olivier Benghozi
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG bet... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and J... Mark Tinka