On 22/Jan/20 16:01, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > And no " TE / TE++ and auto-bandwidth"? > > -seems like ACX5448 is targeted as a CPE box or a L2 switch, According to Juniper, it's targeted as an IP/MPLS router for the Metro and similar applications. It is meant to compete with Cisco's ASR920 and NCS540 boxes, as Juniper have no plans to develop a lite version of the MX204. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Giuliano C. Medalha
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Rob Foehl
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Rob Foehl
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Robert Raszuk
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Eric Van Tol
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Alexandre Guimaraes
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Colton Conor
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Tim Durack
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 adamv0025