Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:57:07PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> Salut Daniel, > Salut :-) Salut :-D
>> I believe Arnaud was looking at using libxml directly for the xml >> part of GNU JAXP as well as another option for GNU JAXP, based on >> some code from Chris Burdess. He's busy with the GNU JAXP/libxmlj >> merge at the moment, though. Also note that I move 'source' to 'src' (don't ask why, I still don't know!) so, now, I'm removing 'src' to 'source'! The merge is on its end. I have to revamp the build to match source (not src) and finish the README file. Chris Burdess already wrote a lot of the bindings and will commit his classes and C code soon. > Okay, I understand that plugging libxml2 in in Java APIs might not be > trivial (API divergence at high level, ref counting) or not really worth > it performance wise (SAX level), but if they need help, the best is to > post on the libxml2 mailing-list there might be others facing similar > problems probably not on Java but with other kind of bindings: > http://xmlsoft.org/bugs.html > > Libxslt might be easier to wrap and provide more benefits speed wise. There is a speed benefit for libxslt but there maybe also conformances benefits from libxml! ;-) Cheers, -- Arnaud Vandyck < sam> /.ing an issue is like asking an infinite number of monkeys for advice -- in #debian-devel _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
