Re: large Class.forName() patch

[Archie Cobbs]

Jason Baker writes:
> >   #define INTEGER_PRIMITIVE_CLASS   "I"
> > 
> > and use INTEGER_PRIMITIVE_CLASS instead of "int".. would this work?
> 
> No, its even worse, since a class in the anonymous package is alot
> more likely to be called "I" than "int".  We can use "I" only where a
> class would be L<path>;.  

Good point.. what about

  #define INTEGER_PRIMITIVE_CLASS       ";I"
  #define BOOLEAN_PRIMITIVE_CLASS       ";Z"

etc.. ?

___________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs   *   Whistle Communications, Inc.  *   http://www.whistle.com