[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13469660#comment-13469660
]
Joe Stein commented on KAFKA-508:
---------------------------------
<< Actually, do you think we can also get rid of the partition field from the
PartitionDataProducerRequest and PartitionDataFetchResponse?
no, i don't think so but maybe I am missing something
<< So we can consider doing this in a separate non-blocker jira as getting the
wire protocol change in is more important.
yeah, seperate discussion
<< BTW, personally I prefer ProducerRequestPartitionData "AB" and
FetchResponsePartitionData "AB" would be better than "BA". What say?
I originally had it that way and changed it because I thought folks might want
it BA, AB is preferable to me patch coming in a sec
> split out partiondata from fetchresponse and producerrequest
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-508
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-508
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Joe Stein
> Assignee: Joe Stein
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: optimization
> Fix For: 0.8
>
> Attachments: KAFKA-508.patch
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
