On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:35:50PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:15:45 -0800, > Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >[talking about kbuild 2.5 speed] > >Then it does seem reasonable to ask that the new one is at least as fast > >as the old one. > > kbuild 2.4 is fast but inaccurate, kbuild 2.5 is slower but accurate. > Pick one. > > I am sure that I can speed up kbuild 2.5 with a rewrite of the core > code but I am staying on stable code to send to Linus.
A couple of questions: a) will 2.5 be as fast as the current system? Faster? b) what's the eta on 2.5? -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
