https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438454
--- Comment #12 from Yuri Chornoivan <yurc...@ukr.net> --- (In reply to Oleksandr Ostrenko from comment #10) > (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #9) > > Roboto is a terrible substitution for ZapfDingbats (which my quess is what's > > being used for the dots). > > > > Install a package that gives you an actual ZapfDingbats compatible font like > > D050000L.otf and while at it please complain to your distro to make that a > > very very very very recommended package for okular. > > OK, after checking my packages I found some Zapfding fonts in > texlive-zapfding: > > /usr/share/texmf/dvips/zapfding/config.uzd > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/adobe/zapfding/pzdr.afm > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/urw/zapfding/uzdr.afm > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/zapfding/uzd.map > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/adobe/zapfding/pzdr.tfm > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/urw35vf/zapfding/uzdr.tfm > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/urw/zapfding/uzdr.pfb > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/urw/zapfding/uzdr.pfm > /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/zapfding/uuzd.fd > > But no OTF fonts. I tried looking into other packages and I found > D050000L.{afm,pfb} in ghostscript-fonts-std. But, again, not an OTF font. So > I had to download and install it manually and, voila, now it works. > > However, I don't quite understand why none of the installed fonts from > texlive-zapfding or ghostscript-fonts-std could be used to substitute it. > Did I miss anything or is it bug? If so, what should I report it against? DejaVu Sans (dejavu-fonts package) should be enough. You can file a bug report against openSUSE package to include it as a dependence as proposed by Albert. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.