On Sunday, January 23, 2011, Allen Winter wrote: > On Tuesday 18 January 2011 6:15:04 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011, Allen Winter wrote: > > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011 4:34:21 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > > hi all ... > > > > > > > > when looking at migrating kdebase to git (thanks to Ian Monroe for > > > > his efforts there and for the support of KO Gmbh that helped make > > > > that happen), it was decided to split it up into chunks which are: > > > > > > > > * kdebase runtime (git -> kderuntime) > > > > * kdebase workspace (git -> kdeworkspace) > > > > > > could we do kde-runtime and kde-workspace instead? > > > only because it's traditional (and because we already have git > > > kdepim-runtime) > > > > oops, sorry, probably just my mistake for not including a dash in there > > .. yeah, that's fine :) > > > > > > * kdebase apps, minus konsole (git -> kdebase-apps) > > > > > > I guess kde-apps won't work. > > > maybe kde-baseapps? > > > > i like that better, yes.. > > Aaron, there is some confusion on the kdebase git rep names. > > We want kde-runtime, kde-workspace, kde-baseapps? > or do we want to keep the old names (kdebase-runtime, kdebase-workspace, > kdebase-apps)?
we're dropping "base" from runtime and workspace as it no longer makes sense. it's just "kde runtime" and "kde workspace". with this split, "kdebase" doesn't make a lot of sense anymore. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
