On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20.54.42 Thomas Lübking wrote: > Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:02:32 +0200 > > schrieb Torgny Nyblom <nyb...@kde.org>: > > Screensaver is bling only > > No, "screensaver hacks are bling only", a "screensaver" is a > software relic.
(Semantics) > The key aspect is "when and why is there eye-candy". > You can still run all scsreensavers to look at them, they're just > ordinary single window applications. > You can even run them fullscreen. No problem. > > BUT: running them automatically because you're away and the system is > idle is simply not a justifiable (anymore), Why? I like this feature. > and that was the concept of a > "screensaver" which was just 10 years ago, but is no way today Agreed. > - and on > battery driven systems actually must be tagged stupid, sorry. But on non battery powered devices? /Regards Torgny
