On Wednesday 12 October 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Wednesday 12 October 2011 08:26:20 Torgny Nyblom wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20.54.42 Thomas Lübking wrote: > > > Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:02:32 +0200 > > > > > > schrieb Torgny Nyblom <nyb...@kde.org>: > > > > Screensaver is bling only > > > > > > No, "screensaver hacks are bling only", a "screensaver" is a > > > software relic. > > > > (Semantics) > > > > > The key aspect is "when and why is there eye-candy". > > > You can still run all scsreensavers to look at them, they're just > > > ordinary single window applications. > > > You can even run them fullscreen. No problem. > > > > > > BUT: running them automatically because you're away and the system is > > > idle is simply not a justifiable (anymore), > > > > Why? I like this feature. > > We have to design software which suits the majority of our users. On a > mailing list like kde-core-devel I had hoped to not get answers like "I > like this feature".
Developers are also users, and probably also like features of KDE :-) Alex
