Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: >El Dilluns, 8 de juliol de 2013, a les 11:25:42, Scott Kitterman va >escriure: >> On Monday, July 08, 2013 04:59:50 PM Àlex Fiestas wrote: >> > On Monday 08 July 2013 10:40:21 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > > We've already experienced having some parts of the SC skip >releases and >> > > it >> > > was a real problem from a distribution perspective. Please, >let's not >> > > do >> > > it again. >> > >> > KDE-PIM will be released, just not with the features of those >working with >> > a 6 months release cycle. >> > >> > For example, in the case of 4.12 it will have (I hope) my >kde-accounts >> > integration but it might not have some of the features developed by >> > Laurent >> > (this is just an hypothetical example). >> >> I don't know how to reconcile that with what you said in the mail I >was >> >> replying to (that you snipped): >> > Then you can target your features for January (4.13) there is no >pressure. >> > As >> > I said before you can keep having 6 months schedule while others >like >> > Frank >> > (or myself) can release features based on 3 month schedule. >> > >> > You don't have to change the way you work because of this. >> >> Either they do have to change and do releases every three months or >elements >> of the SC get skipped on some releases. I don't see how you can have >it >> both ways. > > * all the repositories get released > * repositories only get features that are completed >* If your feature will take more than 3 months to develop, you do it in >a >branch > >I don't see where's the problem and why elemens of the SC will need to >skip >some releases.
As long as they are developing features in branches, I agree. Scott K
