On Friday, 12 December 2014 22:44:39 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
That's very different from saying "whole KDE should just
switch to Gerrit", and I'm not proposing that. Some people have made
themselves clear that no change is going to happen, and I can live with
that.
Where was that discussed? Which people is that?
(Removing PIM from the list, because I don't see this as a PIM matter.)
That was the impression which I got from the #kde-devel IRC channel and the
kde-core-devel ML right after that frameworks BoF during Akademy. When
re-reading the threads and the IRC logs today, I no longer have the
impression that there was a clear, absolute and strict "no", but there was
nonetheless IMHO quite a strong resistance to using something "as horrific
as Gerrit". That might explain why I think that there will be a subset of
people who won't be fine with any change, and because I respect their
opinion, I don't want to force such a change upon them.
So, basically, from my point of view -- the tools are here, the CI is done.
That CI bits in particular make the workflow much more appealing to me. Now
it's up to the KDE developers to come to a decision whether they want that
or not.
With kind regards,
Jan
--
Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/
