> > Therefore sysadmin proposes that both clone and scratch repositories > > be eliminated as a concept with the next iteration of our Git > > infrastructure. > > Noooo not scratch repos. I can see clones being useless as branches > in the actual repos should be used instead, but I personally consider > scratch repos a very useful thing, for example to host simple projects
+1 Or if they had a viable alternative - repos that are instantly created/ deleted. We could always simulate the scratch repos by naming the repo user- scratch-something. Cheerio, Ivan KDE, ivan.cukic at kde.org, http://ivan.fomentgroup.org/ gpg key id: 850B6F76, keyserver.pgp.com
