On Thursday, 29 January 2015 22:57:33 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Given that upstream has had multiple attempts now at an improved interface, I would question whether they would be willing to accept a user interface which is suitable for our needs. It appears that they are quite comfortable with an interface many find unintuitive or difficult to use. If they weren't, considering the number of backers it has - one would think someone would have sponsored such an interface.
I don't think this is an accurate and fair description of upstream. They fixed a UI usability glitch that Martin complained about in less than 12 hours. That sounds like they are pretty welcoming to 3rd-party feedback, IMHO.
As for the CI backend, please mention what is wrong with Jenkins - if it would be integrated to check code review submissions.
The reasons for considering another CI platform are described in my report in section 3.3.
Cheers, Jan -- Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/
