On Monday, 2011-01-24, Martin wrote: > Hi, > > > > The question is whether this is important enough or not. > > If it's a problem then we can skip the 4.6 backport. > I just thought that it would be nice to have it there > > Please tell me about your final decision, whether to do do a backport or > not. I will then commit my patch from reviewboard (and backport if that's > wanted).
I guess this is up to the API's maintainer and the release team (CC'ed, see [1] for context). > PS: Thanks for CC'ing me :) Doesn't make sense to keep you out of the discussion, does it? :) Cheers, Kevin [1] http://lists.kde.org/?t=129453537700001&r=1&w=2 -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
