Am Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:32:36 +0000 schrieb Anne Wilson <cannewil...@googlemail.com>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/11/2013 14:27, Michael wrote: > > Am Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:40:40 +0000 schrieb Anne Wilson > > <cannewil...@googlemail.com>: > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> On 01/11/2013 15:30, Michael wrote: > >>> What I doubt, is that all are absolutely "fine" and "happy" > >>> with his style. > >> > >> Please stop assuming that you answer for others. Clearly you > >> don't. > > > > Huh? I never said I answer for others, I just *assume* stuff and I > > *think* others might be a tad or more annoyed, period. I am not > > the spokesman of all others here, I am just one single guy thinking > > he is (mostly) "right". And I guess you think you are right too. So > > where is the difference? That we disagree and only your point can > > be true? > > > The difference is simple. We'll see about that. ;-) > You "assume" you know what people think. Wrong. I assume I know how most / many feel there. The most important thing to realize there: I *assume*! And I don't get why you have a problem with that. Second, I may be wrong or I may be right. You think I am wrong, I think I am right. Live and let live, eh? Third, I did never say I *know* how folks think or feel, let alone how *all* folks may think / feel / whatever. I said "most" and that should be read as "more than 50% of users here". And even if it would be only 40 or 30% feel more or less unhappy with that kind of style, I bet it would still be more than users just being outright happy with it and enjoying it, which would still mean "most" are unhappy in a mathematical sense (the biggest group of users == most). And from what I read from most users that said something here I get the feeling I am right. Maybe they would not use the word "annoyed" as it might sound to harsh or strong, but I do. Is that the issue here, that you think that word is too strong? > I > know without a doubt that people are individuals, and there is no way > of generalising about them. Sure people are individuals, but we *all* breath, eat, sleep (well...). Most of us have two legs, two arms, one head. Many of us drink coffee or tea, some of us neither. Some may even smoke. And I *assume* when it comes to long redundant and repetitive texts that go "too" deep, many / most humans tend to get annoyed / unhappy in general. I can't prove the last part, that's why I just assume / guess so. Anyway, I guess I can generalize here a great deal, you don't, fine with me. > There's no more to be said about this. I beg to differ... but I wouldn't mind either way. Michael ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
