Matthew Dillon wrote: > Joerg also brought up the st_nlink issue. UFS increments/decrements > a directory's st_nlink count on the creation and deletion of > subdirectories. It does not bump the count in the directory for the > creation and deletion of files. I do intend to change HAMMER to > work the same as UFS in this regard, because 'find' and other programs > seem to depend on it. It isn't quite so easy to do this as it is to > add kqueue support so it may be a while before I get it in, but it > will be in for 2.2.
I think that we should carefully evaluate what the standards say, what is reasonable to expect from a UNIX system and what would have to be changed in find et al to drop these (bogus?) assumptions. cheers simon
