> It seems to me that allowing commits via both Git and Mercurial is > going to be a ton of administrative work if problems arise. Being > that we are a small group do we want to maintain both?
Actually, not, since the two are very similar and the process, as Matt pointed
out, can be mostly automated so manual intervention is almost never required.
This wasn't my idea, but I like it a lot, so I'd volunteer to maintain it
if administrative action is required.
Jeffrey
