> Are there really people that will refuse to use Git to contribute?
Are there really people who refuse to use Mercurial to contribute?
It's a heavy burden to make new committers learn an arcane, admittedly
"evolved", counter-intuitive command set. I'd rather they focus more
on the code and less on struggling with git.
> What is the advantage of having two write systems vs just have hg be a
> read-only mirror of Git?
It's easier for Mercurial users to commit? Anything that lowers the barrier
to contributions is good.
Jeffrey
