Jeffrey Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > People who have already learned git and are used to its eccentricities > can continue to use it. New contributers who have yet to learn either > can pick whichever one is easier to learn, more uniform, and easier to > use. The problem we're trying to avoid at all costs is to force new > committers to learn the counter-intuitive and poorly documented git command > set. > That's what would really increase our new committer mentoring load.
I agree that would be bad. Still, I'm curious, and in no way is this meant to imply support for one SCM over another (I have to learn whichever is chosen, FWIW). Why not spend effort to document the git command set to solve this particular issue? -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< You need not wonder whether you should have an unreliable person as a friend. An unreliable person is nobody's friend.
