Why don't we take a look at OpenCVS too? On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Emil Mikulic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 07:41:19PM +0100, Gergo Szakal wrote: >> (Posted in reply to a wrong topic, sorry. So again:) >> >> I have a practical question. For initial pulls and tree updates which >> one has a better performance? > > You make a good point. > > I don't know the answer, but I'm very much looking forward to replacing > "cvsup" with a "git pull" or "hg pull -u" > > --Emil >
-- System Programmer -- I'm Searching For Perfection, So Even If U Need Portability U've To Use Assembly ;-) -- http://libosdk.berlios.de
