On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Matthias Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > * Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> BTW, pkgsrc scmgit's updating is not controlled by us, so why should >> we risk our project's SCM? > > We don't "risk" our SCM. If we have a stable version, we can use it. If an > update is available, we can either use it or drop it. Even if the pkgsrc > version is broken, we can still use the version which worked for us in the > past. IIRC we deal with cvsup like this ... (besides the fact that we don't > update cvsup at all).
cvsup is not required to make the our old cvs function properly; I think the situation is a little different between git and cvsup. Do you imply we put a binary git in the base? I may be too conservative here... Best Regards, sephe -- Live Free or Die
