https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39877
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #16) > > xt/pl_valid.t 2502354 ms > We can also save some time by not checking *.t files, since they are > executed anyway. *.t files represent approximately 25% of the total time of > pl_valid.t for me. Could be, yes. > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #7) > > Could also happen with pl_valid I > > guess if an external lib introduces changes that breaks our code. But they > > really are edge cases we cannot avoid and that should be caught by the qa > > script anyway. > If an exported subroutine is removed/renamed, code that still use/import it > will fail to compile, but this won't get caught if we are only checking > modified files. Will it be caught by the QA script ? I have no idea why I have written that, it does not make sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
