>I think this is a really nice and important patch set.  Just a couple
>things:
>
>On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 00:02 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
>
>> > In this case the dyn-tick minimum res will be 1msec. I believe it
>should
>> > work ok since this is the case without any dyn-tick.
>>
>> Actually minimum resolution depends on host HZ setting, but - yes -
>> essentially you have the same behaviour of the "unix" timer, plus the
>> overhead of reprogramming the timer.
>
>Is this significant?  At a high guest HZ, this is could be quite a lot
>of additional syscalls right?
>

I believe it's no significant since without dyn-tick the guest will get
the 
same amount of signals so the overhead is doubling the syscalls (not a 
magnitude bigger).

On the other size guests with low HZ and linux guests with dyn-tick will
enojy
from lesser syscalls.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to