sure.. I am going to do bridged networking next thing and re-run my test and
see where I get..
Thanks for the info... I am using rtl8139 driver as windows 2003 server
wasn't recognizing the default one...
*********
the very best would be to have paravirtualized drivers on windows...
there's some work on GPL'ed drivers for windows on Xen; does anybody
knows if they use a similar interface? (virtio?)
*********
Now I don't know where to find that? :( Sorry I am a newbie
Thanks again
Regards
/dev/deep
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Javier Guerra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Dhirendra Pal Singh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is using user based networking, where I am just forwarding all the
> > netbios ports from host to guest.
>
> user based networking is a nice option to have, but a HUGE performance
> hog. get bridged networking.
>
> also, the choice of emulated NIC makes a noticeable difference. i
> think e1000 is the fastest these days.
>
> the very best would be to have paravirtualized drivers on windows...
> there's some work on GPL'ed drivers for windows on Xen; does anybody
> knows if they use a similar interface? (virtio?) so far their
> performance isn't so great, much lower than KVM's e1000, it seems.
> but once they optimize it, it could be similar to linux's virtio
> drivers.
>
>
>
> --
> Javier
>
--
Thanks
Dp
[The force is feminine in nature]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
