On 07.05.2013, at 12:23, Tiejun Chen wrote:

> CONFIG_PPC_DOORBELL is enough to cover all variants.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.c...@windriver.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c |    2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> index 1020119..62d4ece 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static void kvmppc_restart_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu,
>               kvmppc_fill_pt_regs(&regs);
>               timer_interrupt(&regs);
>               break;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_DOORBELL)

The same question still holds. How is this an improvement over the previous 
code? Does this fix any issues for you? Is this just a coding style cleanup?


Alex

>       case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL:
>               kvmppc_fill_pt_regs(&regs);
>               doorbell_exception(&regs);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to