hthttp://www.havanatimes.org/?p=68526tp://www.havanatimes.org/?p=68526<http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=68526tp://www.havanatimes.org/?p=68526>

Cuba’s Left Must Roll Up its Sleeves
April 26, 2012 |

*Pedro Campos*

HAVANA TIMES, April 26 — Cuba is going through critical moments in its
history that are marked by the physical decline of Fidel Castro, the open
recognition of the general failure of the “state socialist” model (which is
really nothing more than concealed state monopoly capitalism), and the
struggle for either the restoration of private capitalism or the advance
toward to a new truly democratic socialist society.

An additional factor is the complex situation facing our sister nation of
Venezuela and its possible impact on the Cuban economy.

The government-Communist Party — pursuing its politics of “updating the
model” — favors the continuation of wage-labor exploitation by the state
and by private domestic and foreign entities over self-managed cooperative
forms of production, which would epitomize socialism.

In the meantime, they are seeking to maintain absolute state control,
particularly over the economic activity of society.

At the same time, we can see contradictions in the official statements
concerning their willingness to carry out democratic transformations in the
political system: Raul Castro speaks of greater democracy within the party
and society, just like the party billboards express the idea that these
changes on the island are for more socialism; nevertheless economic reform
czar Marino Murillo bluntly says there will be no political change in Cuba.

It’s not possible to fully develop socialism without real freedom and
democracy, just as it’s virtually impossible develop full freedom and
democracy without genuine socialism.

*An emerging right alliance*

However, facilitated by the democratic and libertarian deficits in the
current statist model of society, we see a realignment of the
pro-capitalist forces, some from within the state and others that are
outside of it. They are changing their approach from one of confrontation
to more peaceful means and to dialogue; while from the diaspora, well-known
capitalist figures are showing themselves willing to join in the “updating”
with their investments.

Some argue that these movements may reflect the existence of a tacit sort
of agreement between the pro-capitalist wing of the party-government, part
of the hierarchy of the Cuban Catholic Church, major émigré investment
groups and the reigning US Democratic Party, as they seek a peaceful
transition towards the restoration of private capitalism – but like in
China, maintaining strict communist party control over society.

The recent visits to Cuba by the Pope and prominent Cuban-American
businessman Carlos Saladrigas could be contributing to this framework.

The US government maintains many of their laws to keep the blockade/embargo
in place, though they have loosened some of its strings (remittances, the
sales of food and medicine, Cuban-Americans, and travel and cultural
exchanges) while demanding “democratic changes” that the Cuban government
seems unwilling to undertake.

The possible re-election of Democrat Barack Obama is creating expectations
around the continued loosening of other strings of the blockade.

The recent Summit of the Americas showed the isolation of the blockade
policy, something which the US government must take into account. Though
absent, Cuba was the real star of the event.

The inflamed and brutish north is ready to even intervene either militarily
(if Cuba were to apply massive repression) or with the investment of
“generous” amounts of its capital to “develop” the country (like in China)
and exploit (in collusion with the state) the huge “human capital” created
over the past 50 years of the revolution.

*Continued Disarray on the Left*

In the broad democratic Cuban left — critical of traditional statism but
also anti-capitalist — there abound concerns and warnings about the future
of the country and the outcome of the “updating.” However, though there are
some programs and many individual statements, what is not appearing is the
necessary synthesis, harmonization or articulation of our positions.
There’s considerable confusion.

Parenthetically, we recently heard about an official policy on cooperatives
around which experimentation is being conducted, but then there appeared a
local official on TV here in Havana arguing for greater state control of
the cooperatives.

He suggested that cooperatives of parking attendants for multi-unit
buildings – perhaps the most authentic of all existing forms of
cooperatives today in Cuba — should be returned to the State fold in order
to reach a higher level.  Such occurrences indicate how all socialists
must  be on alert!

It’s time for the left — all those individuals and collective defenders of
anti-capitalist, socialist, and revolutionary democratic ideas, ranging
from intellectuals to certain officials within the party and the
government, and especially the many rank-and-file communists — to consider
regrouping our own forces to defend the popular gains previously achieved
(particularly free health care and education), and for all of us to form a
common front against private capitalist restoration – whatever its source.

If we fail to realize the historical moment in which we’re living, if we’re
incapable of leaving behind sectarianism and one-upmanship, if we do not
form a broad front capable of upholding the revolutionary road, we could be
approaching the painful end of this socialist experience.

We will see ourselves overwhelmed by the full restoration of private
capitalism that is rapidly advancing with government compliance, or by the
possibility of imperial intervention (Cuba isn’t China) to the extent that
the Cuban government continues to refuse to carry out the democratic
reforms that increasingly more people are demanding.

*Time for rolling up our sleeves*

Supporters of a more participatory and democratic socialism have always
expressed our readiness for national dialogue without exclusion, for
reconciliation among all Cubans in the search for a common path accepted by
all and for the good of all.

What is done must be based on the agreement of everyone and not just those
holding political or economic power. But in the meantime, the broad left
should come to an agreement on and harmonize our positions.

Democracy yes, but for everyone – where everyone as a whole decides on the
fundamental laws that affect us all, meaning there must be agreement
concerning what investment projects to pursue using the people’s money,
consensus on the structuring of the national and municipality budgets and
the adoption of all public positions through referenda by direct vote using
secret ballots. This would mean direct, participatory democracy, where the
people themselves decide their own fate.

Everyone on the left must “roll up their sleeves,” think about this
situation and try to take the position that they deem appropriate, beyond
the continued acceptance everything that is imposed on us in the guise of
participation.

-------------------------------------
Cuba: Running Up Against the Church

April 26, 2012 |

*Fernando Ravsberg**** <http://cartasdesdecuba.com/>
 <http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=68495>

The emigre writer Uva de Aragon in Havana. (Photo by Rachel Perez)

HAVANA TIMES, April 26 — The Cuban Catholic Church organized a discussion
last weekend on the reintegration of the diaspora into Cuba. Those
participating included a group of leading intellectuals in exile, scores of
scholars from the island, as well as religious believers and lay people.

The event was the first of its kind that wasn’t organized by the Cuban
government, despite the participants having discussed the economic, legal
and cultural aspects of a possible coming together of Cuban émigrés and
those living on the island.

Following the negotiations that ended with the release of all prisoners of
conscience and more than 3,000 common criminals, the clergy now seems
destined to mediate between Miami and Havana, apparently an effort backed
by the government.

One participant at last week’s discussion was Uva de Aragon, who is a
journalist, writer and deputy director of the Cuban Research Institute of
Florida International University. She agreed to talk to me, even if it was
“perhaps an indiscretion” since the event was closed to the press.

*New Horizons for Emigrants*

Uva said, “Cuba is in a time of change and there are many Cubans in the
diaspora who would like to accompany it. Among us there is a great deal of
economic and social capital and talent that can help the country in those
changes.”

The writer feels that the economic reforms show new horizons for emigrants.
“The creation of small businesses opens opportunities to create
partnerships between Cubans abroad and those here,” she said in our
conversation.

“Everyone has relatives, and there are times when a small investment could
start a business,” Uva explained, adding that this is already done
informally but would increase substantially if there was “legal
transparency and guarantees.”

She pointed out that “we would be able to invest but legally, in registered
companies, with guarantees, where the partners would be clearly defined,
with knowledge of what part belongs to each person and who are the owners –
in black and white, like in the rest of the world.”

Uva doesn’t know how the Cuban government will take her recommendations.
“Those things are always a process, but our role as academics is to imagine
the future. However the mere fact that they’re giving this event is a good
sign.”

Another cardinal issue was migration. “In Cuba they should make our lives
less difficult. They overcharge for passports, visas and other formalities.
It’s an important issue not only for us but also for those living on the
island.”

In addition, she proposed that the announced immigration changes include
“eliminating the permanent exit stamp, whereby Cuban citizens who spend
more than 11 months outside of the country are unable to return to reside
permanently on the island.

That discussion was based on the document “The Cuban Diaspora in the 21st
Century,” prepared by academics both on the island and abroad and which
analyzes the problems between the government and emigration as well as
presents recommendations to Washington, Miami and Havana.

Although no official statements were made, everything appears that the
government is welcoming emigrants to join in the changes. Raul Castro
recently called them patriots and individuals in solidarity with Cuba,
leaving in the past such labels as “*gusanos*” (worms) and “*apatridas*”
(unpatriotic traitors).

Some people don’t need any persuading. Just weeks earlier the successful
Cuban-American businessman Carlos Saladrigas gave a lecture in Havana and
in the coming days a meeting will take place with emigrants at the Cuban
Interests Section building in Washington.

The possibility of economically investing in Cuba is beginning to appear
attractive and profitable for some businesses and also for hundreds of
thousands of Cubans who might try to start businesses with family members
within the country.

The anti-Castro politicians of Cuba and Miami are looking at all this
dialogue with much concern. Should it turn out to be fruitful, they could
be left outside of the decision making with very limited support and no
ability to influence the future design of Cuban society.

Dissident Osvaldo Paya, the leader of the Christian Liberation Movement,
said the organizers “are conspiring against true reconciliation and peace,
which can only be achieved by respecting the rights of all Cubans, their
freedom of expression and association, and free elections.”

Nonetheless, this political battle will be uphill for the opposition
because this time it’s not about questioning the Cuban government but the
Catholic clergy and their most prominent secular intellectuals. “We’ve run
up against the church on this matter, Sancho,” Don Quixote would say.**
—–
*(*) An authorized Havana Times translation of the original posted by BBC
Mundo<http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/mundo/cartas_desde_cuba/2012/04/con_la_iglesia_hemos_topado.html>
.*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to