Hello, >> instead of CC-By-SA, and in which case? What determines which actions >> are permitted, and which are not, and which license's rights are >> stronger? > Each license covers the material that it covers. > >> mountain tops - so it's not just 'tiles from and ODbL map'), it would >> have to create ODbL's Derivative Database, which conflicts with >> CC-By-SA imposing CC-By-SA on an Adaptation. And as the product _is_ >> CC-By-SA, you can't say it does not apply... > BY-SA doesn't cover databases though (any potential changes in 4.0 > notwithstanding). Saying so doesn't make any part of CC-By-SA licensed material uncovered by the license. It might not be designed for databases, but it doesn't mean a database is not an Adaptation.
> ODbL is still a comparatively new license and it is reasonable to have > questions about it. I would recommend going to the people who wrote it and > asking them directly, which you can do on the odc-dicuss list: > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/odc-discuss One list a day ;) Sincerely, Tadeusz Knapik _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
