Don't believe everything you read in the papers about Venezuela

Guardian UK
Wednesday April 17, 2002
by Greg Palast

Contrary to the reports of a spoonfed western press, Hugo Chavez was
not unpopular and did not resign, says Greg Palast

Here's what we read this week:

***
"Best Democracy Money Can Buy" Hits NY Times Best Seller List and
hear Palast Thursday April 18th at 9 AM on Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman
***

On Friday, Hugo Chavez, the unpopular, dictatorial potentate of
Venezuela, resigned.  When confronted over his ordering the shooting
of antigovernment protestors, he turned over the presidency to
progressive, democratic forces, namely, the military and the chief of
Venezuela's business council.

Two things about the story caught my eye: First, every one of these
factoids is dead wrong.  And second, newspapers throughout the ruling
hemisphere, from the New York Times to the Independent to (wince) the
Guardian, used almost identical words - "dictatorial", "unpopular",
"resignation" - in their reports.

Let's begin with the faux "resignation" that allowed the Bush and Blair
governments to fall over their own feet rushing towards recognition of
the coup leaders.  I had seen no statement of this alleged resignation,
nor heard it, nor received any reliable witness report of it.  I was
fascinated.  In January, I had broadcast on US radio that Chavez would
face a coup by the end of April.  But resign? That was not the Chavez
style.

I demanded answers from the Venezuelan embassy in London, and from
there, at 2am on Saturday morning, I reached Miguel Madriz Bustamante,
a cabinet member who had spoken with Chavez by phone after the
president's kidnapping by armed rebels.  Chavez, he said, went along
with his "arrest" to avoid bloodshed, but added: "I am still president."

The resignation myth was the capstone of a year-long disinformation
campaign against the populist former paratrooper who took office with
60% of the vote.  The Bush White House is quoted as stating that
Chavez's being elected by "a majority of voters" did not confer
"legitimacy" on the Venezuelan government.  The assertion was not
unexpected from a US administration selected over the opposition of
the majority of American voters.

What neither Bush nor the papers told you is that Chavez's real crime
was to pass two laws through Venezuela's national assembly.  The first
ordered big plantation owners to turn over untilled land to the landless.
The second nearly doubled, from roughly 16% to 30%, royalties paid for
extracting Venezuela's oil.  Venezuela was once the largest exporter of
oil to the USA, bigger than Saudi Arabia.  This explains Chavez's
unpopularity - at least within that key constituency, the American
petroleum industry.

There remains the charge that, in the words of the New York Times,
"Chavez ordered soldiers to fire on a crowd [of protesters]." This
bloody smear, sans evidence, stained every Western paper, including
Britain's newest lefty, the Mirror.  Yet I could easily reach
eyewitnesses without ties to any faction who said the shooting began
from a roadway overpass controlled by the anti-Chavez Metropolitan
Police, and the first to fall were pro-Chavez demonstrators.

I have obtained a cable from the CIA to its station chief in the Capitol:
"Re: Coup.  Activities to include propaganda, black operations,
disinformation, or anything else your imagination can conjure...  "

Admittedly, this is old stuff: written just before the coup against
Salvador Allende.  Times have changed.  Thirty years ago, when US
corporations demanded the removal of a bothersome president, the CIA
thought it most important to aim propaganda at the Latin locals.  Now,
it seems, in the drumbeat of disinformation buzzwords about Chavez -
"dictatorial", "unpopular", "resigned" - the propagandists have learned
to aim at that more gullible pack of pigeons, the American and European
press.

###

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,685907,00.html

Greg Palast is the author of The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, out this
month from Pluto Press.

-------------------------------------------
Macdonald Stainsby
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international

"They are all Enron, we are all Argentina"
    --WEF protesters.
----
In the contradiction lies the hope.
                                     --Bertholt Brecht



_______________________________________________
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international

Reply via email to