https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166195
--- Comment #11 from Eike Rathke <er...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #9) > (In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #8) > The result of the function (strangely enough, a sal_uInt16) A second change maybe could address that, it's just confusing. > is always passed > to CalendarWrapper::setValue - and then to i18n::XCalendar::setValue, taking > sal_Int16. It doesn't seem to make sense to allow out-of-signed-16-bits > values returned from ImpSvNumberInputScan::ImplGetYear - or maybe I > misunderstood? Thanks! Ah darn, you are right, I didn't take i18n::XCalendar::setValue taking only sal_Int16 anyway (not sal_Int32) into account. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
