https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171913
--- Comment #12 from Danat <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #11) > (In reply to Danat from comment #10) > > Well, the most important thing is, that whatever the app does - it not be a > surprise for the user. And this does surprise the user, since they're used > to this action affecting the entire column - due to not having selected > anything. > > Tying to the selection is basically the default rule, the question is what > should LO do when it's "difficult" to respect that rule: > > * Should it make a guess what to do for the rows with different column > layout? > * Should it ask the user? > * Should it act on all rows without the split? > * Should it always act on columns based on the column index, on all rows? > * Should it just refuse and say "Non-uniform column layout, please make a > selection" or something along those lines? > > and maybe there are other options still. Tie to selection without removing anything. So people will be able to change width of entire columns without selection the way the do now, but selection will allow to choose which rows to affect and which not to -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
