Le 28/03/2015 10:06, Andrés Muñiz Piniella a écrit : > https://journals.beds.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/jpd/article/view/81 > > I think we discussed this at length with the 'esperanto' programming > language. It goes over my head but in case someone can find it useful. > > The literature review was very interesting. >
Especially, that litterature focuses on methods and not on language, while numerous programing languages are named, started from logo (children can starts to learn slow with). I recently had a discussion on that list where for subject a "numerous human languages translated" programming language (named SPEL). Nothing to do with an Esperanto-like. And how I disagreed on the new Babel problem it will introduces... This reference points the fact "the problem" is solved differently depending on the programming language itself (don't know who said the famous "come from"). While depending on the problem to solve it is often better to choose the right programming language. Even a language is Turing-compliant, it is harder to build the right machine depending on the nature of the problem (a hammer is not the right tool to swat a fly). That document emphasises on methods. regards, TSFH