On 02/11/2016 05:28 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote: > It's careless to assume that because you don't know of an organization > that does something that therefore none exists. > > There's a non-active organization: http://freeculture.org > and there's a quite active organization that emphasizes science and > government statistical data more than cultural works but *does* include > cultural works and whose definition of "open" *explicitly* aligns with > free/libre values: https://okfn.org/ — Open Knowledge *is* an > organization that cares about free culture and rejects ND and NC licenses.
I already know about them freeculture.org: their last update goes back to 2013 so I cannot consider them active or relevant. And I think I heard about https://okfn.org/ before but aside from being yet another "open" organization, I think they campaign for data more than things that could fall under the "artistic" or "cultural" banner. I'm glad they use free licenses, though.
