On 29/02/16 10:33, Fabio Pesari wrote: > On 02/29/2016 10:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> Back to the theme of making the rebuttals conversational, another good >> one could be: >> >> "Companies don't like the GPL" >> >> "Isn't that a good sign that the GPL is good for you as a user of >> technology? Would you really expect companies to like a license that >> gives you choice and control?" > > "No, what's good for me as a user is a program that just works, > regardless if it's GPL or not." >
"Have you ever had a program that didn't just work exactly the way you wanted though?" "If a program appears to `just work' but has a data leak, is it really working?" > Also, your answer assumes companies to be inherently evil, a position > which most people don't share (most people actually _love_ Apple and > Google). > It is not an "answer", it is just a way to engage in discussion by using questions I agree that directly attacking brands or companies is not helpful, unless the user has already said something to indicate they don't like the company.