On 06/13/2016 05:33 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > The invariant sections in manuals under the GFDL are not part > of the documentation. They are works of opinion. That's what > makes them ethically legitimate, in our view. The documenation is > free, but has to be accompanied with the statement of political > views that support the free software movement. > > It is self-defeating for an activity of the free software movement > to adopt rules against making sure its views reach the public.
I think you mean about it: "with the exceptions of: non-modifiable license texts, works under the GNU Free Documentation License with invariant sections, and works of opinion." Maybe the below example could solve it, eg: with the exceptions of: works of opinion licenses like CC by-ND.[0][1] [0]:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#FreeDocumentationLicenses [1]:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature