On 06/15/2016 04:23 AM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/15/2016 03:15 AM, André Silva wrote: >> On 06/15/2016 02:57 AM, coadde wrote: >>> Now, see my new proposal below with the new changes about invariant >>> sections, what do you think? >> >> +1, however i think we could add another detail in the exception part in >> clause 2 to mean "cover texts" as another exception, eg: >> >> 2. **Parabola is Free Culture**: All documentation and cultural works >> included in products of the Parabola project are [Free >> Culture](http://freedomdefined.org/Definition), >> with the exceptions of: [licenses for works stating a >> viewpoint](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses), >> [invariant >> sections](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC1) and >> [cover texts](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC2). >> All documentation and cultural works created by or for Parabola are >> Free Culture, with no exceptions. > > I forgot add my suggestion about adhocracy with some changes for clause 4 :P > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 4. **Parabola and its community**: Parabola's community is [democratic > in its essence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracy) > and [adhocratic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adhocracy) as form of > organization, > so the community is to be included whenever there is a need to make > a decision. > We encourage community participation in the development of the > project. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Adding "adhocracy" as form of organization clarify how works the > development of the project to encourage community participation. ;) > > What do you think guys?
+1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature