On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 09:45 -0700, Régis Duchesne wrote: > Murray, > > > Looks good to me. I prefer the explicit sig.emit() syntax to sig(), but > > I can live with it. > > IIRC, libsigc++ supports both.
Yes. But it looks like TR2 supports just sig(). -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
