DV> you really want a pointer to an existing connection, not an URI
DV> and hostname. Sure you could get the virConnectPtr based on the
DV> URI, but it's better to rely on the user to do that step
DV> independantly.

So that implies that in order to perform a migration with libvirt, the
user will need the libvirt daemon running and accessible on the remote
machine, is that right?  If so, why should this be necessary?

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgpHNODyXfNX6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to