On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 08:50 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > There, it'd be clearer to diagnose with something like > "missing pool source device name", since there are a few > other "name" elements.
I see Daniel V fixed this (and other) error messages to be less ambiguous when he committed it earlier this morning. > Not a show-stopper at all, but it'd be great if you could add a unit > test or two, so this new code gets some regular coverage. Are there any existing storage pool tests? I can't find them. I should also add some unit tests for the storage pool discovery stuff. -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
