On 08/21/2014 12:50 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 03:35:08PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >> Commit b606bbb41 reminded me that any time we drop locks to run >> back-to-back guest interaction commands, we have to check that >> the guest didn't disappear in between the two commands. A quick >> audit found a couple of spots that were missing this check. >> >> * src/qemu/qemu_driver.c (qemuDomainShutdownFlags) >> (qemuDomainSetVcpusFlags): Check that domain is still up. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> >> --- >>
> > I'm thinking about a place where we could stick this to make it more > generic, but can't find one. That would be a completely different > cleanup anyway, so ACK to this. Thanks; pushed. About the only idea I had would be making qemuDomainObjExitAgent() return a value marked ATTRIBUTE_RETURN_CHECK, where the caller can be informed if the guest is still running every time it regains control after temporarily dropping locks; but that is, as you say, a completely different cleanup because it would touch a lot of callers. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
