On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 07:00:36PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > but you haven't brought > > anything forward to support that "ugly hack" statement in this specific > > case, > > #ifdef based solution is going to be ugly, surely you know that. I > never made any claims about the magnitude of ugliness, I always want > to avoid ugly hacks whenever possible.
If it just requires 2 or 3 #ifdef, adding them and forgetting they existed would have been faster than this thread ;) > > > nor any hard data regarding which distros could be impacted by a > > req bump. I'll stop this discussion until you bring some concrete > > datapoints to the table. > > Fair enough! The main point of this discussion was not to convince you > but rather to get a third opinion. Honestly, this is a very weird attitude, rather than trying to come with hard facts, you prefer having some kind of poll and make an arbitary uninformed decision. Christophe
pgprNruIq4_hU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
